green party daryl northrop elections northern virginia green party ballot petitioning campaign finance reform maryland green party running for office 2010 election grassroots democracy illinois instant runoff voting IRV messaging values ballot access blog campaign school clean elections equality green party watch internet money natasha pettigrew rich whitney tactics ten key values twitter brent mcmillan corporate personhood DC Green Party Ddaryl northrop democratic party economics economy education electoral college environmentalism fairvote framing green pages green party of pennsylvania green party of the united states gspm liberty tree message grid party platform politics questions republican party social justice social networking sustainable funding tech texas democratic party texas green party voters 2011 accountability agency capture alterman Alternet anita stewart arizona greens party arkansas arlington green party attack ad ballota access baltimore green party blog talk radio bloomberg budget candidate pledge cathie black civil war clean energy common sense congress congress. green party dalai lama david cobb defense deficit democracy dennis spisak detroit don crawford donkey earth day edward kennedy egypt elephant energy independence facebook fairfax county greens first past the post florida florida green party food george lakoff ggreen party of the united states gloria totten goals gpny gpus gpva graduate school of political management green change green party of canada green party of lebanon green party of new york green party UK gregg jocoy growth gwu hashtags healthcare history housing huffington post hugh giordano ignorance independent media issues jason west jay fisette jobs john reeder lakoff larry lessig lebanon libertarian party libya Linda Piera-Avila manners media middle east military mixed member proportional representation mmove to amend morals move to amend national popular vote new york city non violence npv oath of office obama ohio green party oil opposition research peace pennsylvania pledge of allegiance podcast pollution potatoes progressive progressive majority proportional representation qruicktakes ranked choice voting regulation renewable energy republic russia same sex marriage slavery social media socialist party usa soil and water soldiers south carolina spectator sport steve kramer stewart alexander strategy tactical ignorance taxes texas the alyona show the george washington university the nation the secret frequency third parties towards a green future toyota transportation tthe alyona show tunisia two party system ukuncut unemployment US senate US Social Forum usuncut virginia green party voting wall street journal washington dc
« Races to watch: Maryland - Natasha Pettigrew for U.S. Senate | Main | 3 > 2. How do other countries deal with multi-party systems? »
Tuesday
Aug102010

Framing your message: Use your frame, not your opponents.

Framing - it's the concept of expressing your message on your own terms, and not those of your opponents. Conservatives are great at framing. Slashing government services to the middle class and the poor is not called "service cuts" it's called "tax relief" or "fiscal discipline." After all, who could be against that?

What's wrong with this quote? (Source 08-10-10)

"Progressive Majority is not going to let conservatives dominate the 2010 elections. We're helping nearly 150 progressives with their November campaigns - more than nearly any other organization. In November, voters will once again prove that progressive politics is a winning politics."

-Gloria A. Totten
President, Progressive Majority

 The three sentences in Ms Totten's statement are good. There is nothing wrong with them. Except that they are in exactly the opposite order of what they should be. Now, to be fair, I do not know Ms Totten, or the origin of the statement. It may have been off-the-cuff, or taken from a larger text. However, it is useful for this brief discussion on framing.

When making a political statement, it is key to lead with the conclusion first. Yes, I know we are taught exactly the opposite in school. But in the example, the strongest sentence is the third sentence - which is basically the entire point of her idea - progressive politics is popular with voters/Americans, and candidates can win by being progressive (as opposed to conservative, or centrist/conservative, or reactionary). The "We're helping..." sentence should stay in the middle. Lastly, the "not going to let conservatives" dominate" should be at the end.

By keeping first sentence about conservatives, your framing tells the audience that:

1. Conservatives are going to dominate the 2010 elections.

2. Progressive politics does not dominate elections.

3. Most people vote conservative if in fact conservatives are dominating elections.

4. If most people are voting conservative, shouldn't I seriously consider it?

 

We know how this story ends - it ends with progressives not being elected.

Always lead strong with a value statement that sets the framing on your terms. "Progressive values are American values, and in November, the voters will prove it!" Once your frame is set, you are speaking about your values, your issues, your plans, and your ideas on your terms.

Great writing about framing, values, and morals in politics has been done by George Lakoff, author of "Don't Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate--The Essential Guide for Progressives" and "Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think."

 

--

Daryl Northrop

Reader Comments (2)

I think the biggest problem for Democrats, who are the politicians being referenced in the quote, is that they keep governing like conservatives.

August 15, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterlibhomo

Lib - thanks for commenting! I agree. On about 90% of the issues, there is really no substantive difference between the two parties. The other 10% are wedge issues. As more and more Americans are coming to realize, the two major parties are doing a terrible job of representing the color, richness, and diversity of political thought in this country.

August 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDaryl Northrop

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>