green party daryl northrop elections northern virginia green party ballot petitioning campaign finance reform maryland green party running for office 2010 election grassroots democracy illinois instant runoff voting IRV messaging values ballot access blog campaign school clean elections equality green party watch internet money natasha pettigrew rich whitney ten key values twitter brent mcmillan corporate personhood DC Green Party Ddaryl northrop democratic party economics economy education electoral college environmentalism fairvote framing green pages green party of pennsylvania green party of the united states gspm liberty tree message grid party platform politics questions republican party social justice social networking sustainable funding tactics tech texas democratic party texas green party voters 2011 accountability agency capture alterman Alternet anita stewart arizona greens party arkansas arlington green party attack ad ballota access baltimore green party blog talk radio bloomberg budget candidate pledge cathie black civil war clean energy common sense congress congress. green party dalai lama david cobb defense deficit democracy dennis spisak detroit don crawford donkey earth day edward kennedy egypt elephant energy independence facebook fairfax county greens first past the post florida florida green party food george lakoff ggreen party of the united states gloria totten goals gpny gpus gpva graduate school of political management green change green party of canada green party of lebanon green party of new york green party UK gregg jocoy growth gwu hashtags healthcare history housing huffington post hugh giordano independent media issues jason west jay fisette jobs john reeder lakoff larry lessig lebanon libertarian party libya Linda Piera-Avila manners media middle east military mixed member proportional representation mmove to amend morals move to amend national popular vote new york city non violence npv oath of office obama ohio green party oil opposition research peace pennsylvania pledge of allegiance podcast pollution potatoes progressive progressive majority proportional representation qruicktakes ranked choice voting regulation renewable energy republic russia same sex marriage slavery social media socialist party usa soil and water soldiers south carolina spectator sport steve kramer stewart alexander strategy taxes texas the alyona show the george washington university the nation the secret frequency third parties towards a green future toyota transportation tthe alyona show tunisia two party system ukuncut unemployment US senate US Social Forum usuncut virginia green party voting wall street journal washington dc writing zombies

Entries in ballot petitioning (5)

Friday
Jul022010

From the Texas Department of Redundancy Department of Texas...

NEWSFLASH: Texas League of Conservation Voters, who have already endorsed Bill White for Governor in TX will REALLY REALLY REALLY not be endorsing the Green Party candidates.

Just a hint for the TX LCV - if you don't want to endorse Green Party candidates, that's your choice. You can endorse Democrats until the end of time, and then sit scratching your heads wondering why the environment keeps getting worse and worse. However, at least show some spine when the Texas Democratic Party orders you to put out a hit piece on the Texas Green Party.

At the end of the day, when all the phony outrage and political chest-pounding is over, the Texas Green Party is the only party that is serious about protecting the environment in the Lone Star State. And what's worse is, you know it.

 

TLCV supports third party ballot access and would, under normal circumstances, support Green Party candidates who share the organization’s values and goals.

 

So, apparently it's ok to support third-party ballot access (until they actually get on the ballot) and Green Party candidates who support the environment (until they actually get on the ballot).

Normally that level of two-faced hypocrisy is reserved for inside the Beltway. I guess things really are bigger in Texas. And yes, it is too bad that the TX Greens had to accept out of state help to get 90,000+ ballot signatures. But, when you are required to get 43,991 valid signatures before the Secretary of State recognize it as an official political party. To further complicate the process, Texas requires that signatures be gathered during a very narrow time period of 75 days, and only registered voters who did not vote in the primary are eligible to sign. This “primary screen-out” provision is exclusive to Texas. All other states that previously had this provision have since eliminated it.

 --

Daryl Northrop

Saturday
Jun122010

And now, a word about Texas....

Texas is a state, where like every other state, Democrats and Republicans have traded power back and forth. Since Democrats and Republicans like to monopolize their grip on political power, they put various hurdles to stop, delay, and discourage independent candidates and other political parties from participating in their democracy. So how does that manifest itself in an electoral cycle? Lets take a look...

 

 In Texas, if you want to get your party on the ballot, the first hurdle is the petition drive. You have to gather a lot of signatures, from a certain class of voters, in a very short amount of time. The TX Green Party spells it out in a recent press release.

 

The Green Party of Texas will turn in over 90,000 signatures on Monday, in an effort to get the Party on the General Election ballot this November. If accepted, this will be the first time the Green Party has had ballot access since 2002.

The State of Texas maintains one of the nation’s most restrictive ballot access policies. Currently, a political party seeking a place on the ballot must gather 43,991 valid signatures before the Secretary of State recognize it as an official political party.

To further complicate the process, Texas requires that signatures be gathered during a very narrow time period of 75 days, and only registered voters who did not vote in the primary are eligible to sign. This “primary screen-out” provision is exclusive to Texas. All other states that previously had this provision have since eliminated it. (emphasis mine)

That's restrictive. Extremely restrictive.

But that's not the worst part. The worst part is that the Democrats and Republicans then play legal ping-pong with the TX Green Party in order to keep them off the ballot when they do manage to clear the onerous hurdles to democracy placed in their path! In essence, the TX Democratic Party, upset that the Green Party got funding to help with the petition drive, is suing the TX Greens, and delaying the filing of their slate of candidates. This is pure political hypocrisy. First, the two major parties through obstacles and hurdles in the way of political parties that dare to represent people instead of special interests. Then, if all the hurdles are cleared, they drag you to court!

Now, it is unfortunate that the TX Green Party had to accept extra funding in order to get the enormous amount of petition signatures. But, it was the TX Democrats and TX Republicans that put the ballot access requirements in effect in the first place! Sorry, TX Democrats, but you cannot have it both ways.

It comes down to a simple comparison of values.

The Texas Green Party believes that the voters deserve more choices at the ballot box.

The TX Democratic Party does not. 

--

Daryl Northrop

Friday
May142010

Election Dynamics Part 1: Know Your Environment

Hello! As promised, here is part one of the Election Dynamics article series. This series of articles will be discussing some of the important factors that Green Party candidates need to be aware of when deciding to run for elected office.

We are a political party, first and foremost, not an issue-advocacy group. There are groups out there for that, but this is about politics and democracy, and that means building support among the electorate and winning elections.

In this first article, we will talk about the basic steps that need to be taken when researching a run for office.

Know Your Environment

This is absolutely key when running for office. 

1. Scheduling: when are elections scheduled in your jurisdiction? They may be scheduled yearly or every two years. This is important because you need to plan enough lead-time in order to mount a successful campaign that has a good chance of meeting your campaign goals. The lesson to take away is: The more lead-time, the better. Knowing the election schedule will allow you to start earlier, which allows for more organizing time, more fundraising time, better messaging, identification of supporters, and planning. For example: I ran for U.S. Senate in Iowa for the 2004 election. I started planning and organizing in the late summer/fall of 2003, and started the campaign in December 2003 - nearly a full year before the elections.

 

2. Filing requirements: Filing requirements can vary greatly between jurisdictions, and states. The vast majority of election law is written at the state legislature level, and this leads to some great diversity. If you are running for a state legislative seat, a state-wide elected seat (governor, attorney general, etc), or Congressional seat - you will want to visit your states Department of Elections or Secretary of State's website and familiarize yourself with the rules for candidates.

If you are running for local office (county-level or below), you will also want to check with the appropriate local election authority. Some jurisdictions (but not all!) have "Home Rule" and set their own election laws and requirements. Minneapolis, MN and St. Paul, MN are good examples of cities that set their own election regulations. 

Petition vs Convention vs Primary - or, "How the heck do I get my name on the ballot?!" - You will also need to know how to get your name on the ballot. Here are the more common methods:

A. Petition - the jurisdiction requires X number of valid signatures on or before a certain date in order to get your name on the ballot. Now, the art and science of signature gathering is far to deep and complex to get into here, but suffice it to say, you can never start petitioning too early (at least not earlier than permissible by law), and you can never have too many signatures. A good guideline is to gather at least twice as many signatures as required by law. If you need 250 signatures, get 500, etc. Some advantages to petitioning are: it's a low-pressure way to get your name out "Hi, I'm running for dog catcher, my name is John Smith, can you help me put my name on the ballot this November?" Don't forget to give them your pamphlet after they are done signing....

B. Convention - some states allow for party nominating conventions. Generally, a convention must be convened with a specified number of delegates from each county within the voting district (congressional district or state-wide if US Senate, Governor, etc). If you are a Green running in a state that allows this, and you have a strong, organized state Green Party, this may be the route to follow. Close coordination and early consultation with local and state Green Party leaders is key in order to lock in their support, especially if you have two or more Greens competing to run on the same ballot line. It's a nice problem to have, but can cause conflict and disruption within the party if there is a "contested" convention.

C. Primary - If your state Green Party has full ballot access like our adversaries in the two-party duopoly, you may have to participate in the primary contest. This is simply a process by which the voters of the state decide who the candidate will be. Getting on the primary ballot often requires gathering petition signatures as earlier mentioned. However, if you win the primary, you are generally guaranteed the ballot line in the fall without further petitioning requirements. Again, consult your state Dept of Elections or Secretary of State.

 

3. Misc: Other factors to consider....

Is the race partisan or non-partisan? Many local level races do not allow direct party labels or mention of party names in campaign material. You will need to consider if this is an asset or a liability. Also, this will factor into your messaging - as a Green Party member, you may have to put more specific emphasis on Green Party values and ideas to fully identify you as the true progressive in the race!

Single seat vs Multi-seat? Some elected boards (school, water, conservation, etc) elect multiple members at once. Often this appears as a list of candidates with a "choose no more than 3" on the ballot. Many times the number of people running is less than the number of open seats. This could be an easy win for you and your Green Party allies.

Defined geographic district vs At Large? Many seats (city council, legislative) are defined districts with residency requirements. However, some city council seats and other elected bodies (county board of supervisors) have "at large" seats that allow anyone within a wider area to run, and not be tied to a specific area of voters.

________________________

This concludes part one of the 3 part series on Election Dynamics. Hope you have found it useful and informative. Suggestions and comments are welcome! 

Stay tuned for Election Dynamics Part 2: What is the goal of running for office? (Hint - it can be for reasons other than winning the election? GASP! What?)

 

Daryl Northrop

http://www.darylnorthrop.com/


Wednesday
Mar242010

Hugh Giordano running for State Rep in PA!

Hello citizens!

Spotted this great article about Hugh Giordano. He is a Green Party candidate for State Representative in the 194th district, which comprises parts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania County, and Philadelphia County. Hugh is a union organizer, with a Masters Degree in Legal and Ethical Studies.

He's running a clean-funded campaign with no donations from special interests, just like all Green Party candidates do!

In order for him to be on the ballot, he needs your help with ballot petitioning. Interested? Go to this link for more info.

His comprehensive campaign platform includes:



GREEN JOBS/GREEN ECONOMY
We must invest in green technology -Solar, Wind, and Hydro. Besides being good for the environment it also will be a way to create jobs in the creation, installation, and up-keep of these technologies. We also must re-localize our economy which means becoming a manufacturing state once again.  I will work to get abandoned factories reopened and in use.
EDUCATION
My priority is ensuring the basic necessities for quality education exist in every classroom: books, qualified teachers, teachers’ aides, and appropriate technology.  I want to see expanded programs in the arts, sports, leadership, etc. both during school time and after school.
Equitable funding of public schools can only be achieved by shifting funding away from local property tax toward a more progressive statewide tax such as a graduated income tax.
HEALTHCARE
I believe that healthcare is a basic human right, therefore I support single-payer universal healthcare, specifically HB 1660.  Read more at: http://www.healthcare4allpa.org/
TAXES
I would like to see a graduated progressive income tax, knowing that this requires a constitutional amendment.  I am also supportive of raising certain business taxes (including the elimination of tax breaks and loopholes), particularly on large businesses and businesses that are in other ways destructive (i.e. pollute, abuse workers).  I also support a severance tax on natural gas drilling and other extractive industries.
CRIME
We must radically rethink our approach to crime and prisons.  First, we should not be putting non-violent offenders in prison.  We also need to speed up the judicial process so that people are not languishing in jail for long periods of time before trials.  We should definitely be reining in the exploding prison budget and spending more on probation and rehabilitation.  However, we should also be spending money on education and seeing this as the most proactive approach to our crime problem.
DRUG REFORM
Addiction is a public health issue, not a crime.  I want to see non-violent drug offenders rehabilitated.  I support the decriminalization of marijuana and want to see its sale regulated and taxed appropriately.
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
I believe in the right of all couples to marry whether straight or gay, which would ensure equal economic and social rights for all couples.  I support SB 935 and oppose the Defense of Marriage Act.
WOMEN’S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS
I’m pro-choice.  The state should have no right employ delaying tactics to pressure women into not choosing abortion.  I also believe in comprehensive sex education such as that envisioned by Planned Parenthood’s call for “REAL Sex Education.”
FORMING UNIONS
I believe it is EVERY workers right to form a union. I will actively go after Executives and Management that harass and threaten workers when they attempt to form a union. I will support legislation that makes CEO’s accountable for the illegal tactics of lower management.

Good luck Hugh, we will be watching your race, and helping out any way we can!

--
Daryl Northrop

Thursday
Jan282010

Maryland Green Party needs ballot petitioning help! Here's how you can get into the action:

http://www.mdgreens.org/petition/

The Maryland Green Party needs your help in gathering petition signatures so their candidates can get on the ballots.

Why get involved?

1. The Maryland Green Party accepts zero PAC, union, or corporate funding - they depend on individuals like you.
2. Maryland voters deserve better choices at the ballot box!
3. Important issues are being ignored by the two-corporate funded parties: jobs, health care, pollution.

Go to http://www.mdgreens.org/petition/  to get involved!

--
Daryl Northrop