Twitter vs Reality vs personal attacks
Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 10:22AM Hello all,
As an avid twitter user, I try to follow a wide range of people, from conservative to liberal, and from non-political to hyper-political. Often times there will be a spirited back and forth, especially with those who hold differing political views than I do.

However, when does a spirited exchange cross the line, and what are the consequences?
1. Repeated rejection of reality. Examples: human activity does not cause global warming, social security is broke, 9-11 was an inside job, NATO is bombing innocent Libyan civilians because it is racist/oil-grabbing. CONSEQUENCES: I will cease to respond. If the activity continues, I may un-follow.
2. Repeated rejection of reality followed up by ad-hominem personal attacks. Examples: @spiritofmadison termed me evil and cold hearted because I wished to make some minor fixes to the social security system. CONSEQUENCES: blocked.
I suspect my unfollowing activity might increase as hysterical and extremist political tweets multiply as we get closer to the 2012 general election. Disclaimer: I am an equal opportunity unfollower and blocker. Extreme non-sense and personal attack from the far left or far right get the same response.
See you on the tweeter!
Daryl Northrop


